Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Lee de Cesare - elderly female writer of vile stuff

http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/10/first-bullying-charge.html

>The Board lard-asses attend so many political banquets and sundry eating opportunities in the high and gluttony office of school board members that they have waxed fatter than fat. Being overweight and an aficionado of food wretched- excess goes along with the role of political functionaries. No prissy linguistics killjoys need protest that "lard-ass" is a vulgarity. The word has an impeccable linguistic history, having been found on the caves of Lescaux of our prehistoric ancestors along with the bison drawings. "Lard-asses" moves along nicely in the language of the human race and is, in fact, a term that finds its place in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales as well as in comic masterpieces through the ages. <

Oh, you can write "lard-ass" but not "arse"! Hypocrite.

http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/08/error-erron-on-walll.html

>Linda says that the redaction was on separate paper with the Board's logo at the top. But that does not change the school's undermining the legitimacy of the Sheriff's investigation. That is dumb diplomacy to cover Tom Gonzalez's lazy ass. lee <


http://es-kay.net/?p=1182
>Is John a polymath, or is he just beating his chest and pretending to be one? I have met my share of machno grammarians in the faculty lounge who didn’t know their ass from their elbow.<

Vile, vile, vile!

3 comments:

Goader said...

>Is John a polymath, or is he just beating his chest and pretending to be one? I have met my share of machno grammarians in the faculty lounge who didn’t know their ass from their elbow.<

A more correct citation for the above quote is: >http://es-kay.net/?p=1182#comment-3027<

It will take you directly to the comment to which you refer.

John__D said...

Thanks for the link. Citing the comment exactly will save on scrolling, although I certainly hope that the quotes won't get taken out of context if people aren't able to read everything else. I've been accused of this in the past.

I'm not sure about "more correct" either. My reference still takes the reader to the web page where th comment is available to be read. Either something is correct or it isn't. More accurate, perhaps, could better describe the situation? I would hate to pretend to know what you meant, Goader! Again, I've been accused of this in the past.

Feel free to comment on the issues, by the way!

Goader said...

I think I meant it was more better!