http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/11/how-do-these-guys-pass-bar.html
Vinegartits will publish comments about my being someone's gay husband so that everyone can have a laugh, but she wouldn't post my reply. Typical. First amendment, my queynte.
My reply:
>Most posts on this subject say that nothing at all was found.<
Okay, Goader. "Most" obviously didn't cut it for you. Try this:
Most posts I have read on this subject say that nothing was found at all.
Better? I ddn't say that there was an effort to hide facts. What it seems and what it is are two different things. Esse quam videri.
If I can find spare time, I'll sift through your older posts and try to find your writing that they found indicators of abuse. Or you could provide a link for me, if you like. I would like to know if there is a post on this blog [Casting Room Couch] that outlines that there were indicators of abuse. I'd welcome that link also.
Goader, have you ever mentioned in a post that the CPI deemed that coaxial cable was not designed for restraining students? Click, click, click. Sorry, my ruby slippers ain't finding it. Could you please provide a link?
4:25 PM
John__D said...
"it was not in good judgment to use a tool (coaxial cable) not designed and approved to restrain students."Damn straight. "Not designed" is one thing. "Not approved" is another.I hadn't realised that the CPI had found verified indicators of abuse, neglect or abandonment. Most posts on this subject say that nothing at all was found.Thanks for posting the link. It certainly is good to have all the info.
2:27 AM
Anonymous said...
lee i can't find this guy (the attorney) in the florida bar member search.
12:39 PM
Goader said...
John_D, you make it seem like there was a concerted effort to hide facts about my case from readers like you. You are being disingenuous by promulgating—actually fabricating—the existence of a conspiracy where none existed. Perhaps you were not reading "Goader" when I first wrote about the case and subsequently revealed the facts, including the coaxial cable and the finding of abuse by the Child Protective Agency representative. Just because you are finding out about all the facts now does not mean a conspiracy existed.
2:58 PM
Anonymous said...
Is John D. Candy Olson's gay husband?
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Go away, Vox.
http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/11/its-my-blog-and-ill-use-it-as-mood.html
>no he's still just trying to derail the discussion, lee.<
Naturally you would support and empathise the board when they allege that Lee is trying to derail a discussion at a meeting.
You people give it, but you can't take it. I couldn't care if you never wrote a keystroke to me. Just don't. I've been happy for two years listing Lee's hypocrisy at my blog, and I've never looked for attention. I've posted on this blog many times and no one responded. Lee loves burying the comments. That's fine, too.
I just didn't like being told to STFU. Now, FO, Vox, so I can get back to what I was doing.
>no he's still just trying to derail the discussion, lee.<
Naturally you would support and empathise the board when they allege that Lee is trying to derail a discussion at a meeting.
You people give it, but you can't take it. I couldn't care if you never wrote a keystroke to me. Just don't. I've been happy for two years listing Lee's hypocrisy at my blog, and I've never looked for attention. I've posted on this blog many times and no one responded. Lee loves burying the comments. That's fine, too.
I just didn't like being told to STFU. Now, FO, Vox, so I can get back to what I was doing.
The denigration of women - check your Chaucer.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=28089922&postID=3151165497187783770&page=1
>Anonymous said...
I sad bad Photoshop pic blogger posted of you. Well, I saw you in person at a meeting, and you're one classy lady. Well dressed and in good shape. Why do some sickos feel the need to denegrate women?<
>Why do some sickos feel the need to denegrate women?<
No, clown. I am satirising Lee. (One woman.) You know - satire? Like when Chaucer wrote about a queynte? Or is that denigrating women, too?
>Anonymous said...
I sad bad Photoshop pic blogger posted of you. Well, I saw you in person at a meeting, and you're one classy lady. Well dressed and in good shape. Why do some sickos feel the need to denegrate women?<
>Why do some sickos feel the need to denegrate women?<
No, clown. I am satirising Lee. (One woman.) You know - satire? Like when Chaucer wrote about a queynte? Or is that denigrating women, too?
Lee, tell Vox to lay off.
http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/11/lock-and-load-time-to-mosey-on-down-to.html
Lee, you had better advise Vox to lay the [insert truncated profanity here] off. If she isn't going to address me directly but in third person, I am still going to respond to her.
It's not my anonymous comment. This is ironic. My original question was about anonymity. I hope that someone from the school board alleges that your "anonymous" poster about homeless people was actually you.
>He has no first amendment rights here.<
Why,? Aren't we in America anymore? Vox has had the hide to say that I'm anti-American if I'm against the constitution (which I wasn't?!) and now tells me that I have no free speech. Oh, I'll contribute to the issues if you like, Vox, and I'll whistle the Star-Spangled Banner while I do.
Again I ask: what are your contributions to casting room couch? Calling everyone criminals with no proof, making fun of people's physical appearance with a bit of name-calling and telling Lee how wonderful she is. Teachers all over the country must be so glad to have you aboard.
>I am not the subject here, nor is John. The subject is the corruption of the school board and improving the world in general for all of us.<
One of the recurring themes about the school is bullying. You are a bully, Vox. Lee is a bully. If this truly is the subject (and Lee is writing to all and sundry complaining that it is) then why not take a leaf out of Ghandi's book and be the change that you want to see in the world?
Vox Populi said...
See, lee. He probably made that anonymous comment. He continues to change the subject TO HIMSELF. John is A TROLL.
I am not the subject here, nor is John. The subject is the corruption of the school board and improving the world in general for all of us.
I don't see John contributing there.
He's just trolling.He has all the hallmarks of a troll.
He has no first amendment rights here. I made a mistake addressing him in the first place. At every opportunity he takes the attention to HIMSELF. This blog isn't to discuss John's obvious lack of insurance coverage or reluctance to visit the EAP at his employer's expense.
I would post this anonymously BECAUSE I CAN. But won't.
Lee, you had better advise Vox to lay the [insert truncated profanity here] off. If she isn't going to address me directly but in third person, I am still going to respond to her.
It's not my anonymous comment. This is ironic. My original question was about anonymity. I hope that someone from the school board alleges that your "anonymous" poster about homeless people was actually you.
>He has no first amendment rights here.<
Why,? Aren't we in America anymore? Vox has had the hide to say that I'm anti-American if I'm against the constitution (which I wasn't?!) and now tells me that I have no free speech. Oh, I'll contribute to the issues if you like, Vox, and I'll whistle the Star-Spangled Banner while I do.
Again I ask: what are your contributions to casting room couch? Calling everyone criminals with no proof, making fun of people's physical appearance with a bit of name-calling and telling Lee how wonderful she is. Teachers all over the country must be so glad to have you aboard.
>I am not the subject here, nor is John. The subject is the corruption of the school board and improving the world in general for all of us.<
One of the recurring themes about the school is bullying. You are a bully, Vox. Lee is a bully. If this truly is the subject (and Lee is writing to all and sundry complaining that it is) then why not take a leaf out of Ghandi's book and be the change that you want to see in the world?
Vox Populi said...
See, lee. He probably made that anonymous comment. He continues to change the subject TO HIMSELF. John is A TROLL.
I am not the subject here, nor is John. The subject is the corruption of the school board and improving the world in general for all of us.
I don't see John contributing there.
He's just trolling.He has all the hallmarks of a troll.
He has no first amendment rights here. I made a mistake addressing him in the first place. At every opportunity he takes the attention to HIMSELF. This blog isn't to discuss John's obvious lack of insurance coverage or reluctance to visit the EAP at his employer's expense.
I would post this anonymously BECAUSE I CAN. But won't.
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Lee's views on the First Amendment
You would like this one, Vox.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=28089922&postID=114800803467888235
>I will publish your chicaneries that I detect on this blog. You are going to sue me for telling the truth? Bring it on, ma'am. Bring it on if you dare. I have always wanted to be a martyr for the First Amendment. How much more glamorous a role can I get to enter into my eternal resume? My children will put on my Brooksville tombstone: "Dear Old Mom--Great Cook and Martyr for the First Amendment."<
No, I reckon Lee's children will write "Liked the First Amendment when it suited, but would not apply it consistenly, let alone die for it."
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=28089922&postID=114800803467888235
>I will publish your chicaneries that I detect on this blog. You are going to sue me for telling the truth? Bring it on, ma'am. Bring it on if you dare. I have always wanted to be a martyr for the First Amendment. How much more glamorous a role can I get to enter into my eternal resume? My children will put on my Brooksville tombstone: "Dear Old Mom--Great Cook and Martyr for the First Amendment."<
No, I reckon Lee's children will write "Liked the First Amendment when it suited, but would not apply it consistenly, let alone die for it."
Lee de Cesare - elderly female writer of vile stuff
http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/10/first-bullying-charge.html
>The Board lard-asses attend so many political banquets and sundry eating opportunities in the high and gluttony office of school board members that they have waxed fatter than fat. Being overweight and an aficionado of food wretched- excess goes along with the role of political functionaries. No prissy linguistics killjoys need protest that "lard-ass" is a vulgarity. The word has an impeccable linguistic history, having been found on the caves of Lescaux of our prehistoric ancestors along with the bison drawings. "Lard-asses" moves along nicely in the language of the human race and is, in fact, a term that finds its place in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales as well as in comic masterpieces through the ages. <
Oh, you can write "lard-ass" but not "arse"! Hypocrite.
http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/08/error-erron-on-walll.html
>Linda says that the redaction was on separate paper with the Board's logo at the top. But that does not change the school's undermining the legitimacy of the Sheriff's investigation. That is dumb diplomacy to cover Tom Gonzalez's lazy ass. lee <
http://es-kay.net/?p=1182
>Is John a polymath, or is he just beating his chest and pretending to be one? I have met my share of machno grammarians in the faculty lounge who didn’t know their ass from their elbow.<
Vile, vile, vile!
>The Board lard-asses attend so many political banquets and sundry eating opportunities in the high and gluttony office of school board members that they have waxed fatter than fat. Being overweight and an aficionado of food wretched- excess goes along with the role of political functionaries. No prissy linguistics killjoys need protest that "lard-ass" is a vulgarity. The word has an impeccable linguistic history, having been found on the caves of Lescaux of our prehistoric ancestors along with the bison drawings. "Lard-asses" moves along nicely in the language of the human race and is, in fact, a term that finds its place in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales as well as in comic masterpieces through the ages. <
Oh, you can write "lard-ass" but not "arse"! Hypocrite.
http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/08/error-erron-on-walll.html
>Linda says that the redaction was on separate paper with the Board's logo at the top. But that does not change the school's undermining the legitimacy of the Sheriff's investigation. That is dumb diplomacy to cover Tom Gonzalez's lazy ass. lee <
http://es-kay.net/?p=1182
>Is John a polymath, or is he just beating his chest and pretending to be one? I have met my share of machno grammarians in the faculty lounge who didn’t know their ass from their elbow.<
Vile, vile, vile!
Lee will make up any excuse. You be the judge.
http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/11/lock-and-load-time-to-mosey-on-down-to.html
>I received bitter email from John D. and deleted it. The fellow is sicko. His words will no longer appear in Casting-room-couch's pages. Goodbye to all that. His next Internet Provider will probably be Chattahoochee. lee
Posted by twinkobie at 10:56 AM <
This alleged "bitter" email is the previous post on this blog. A particularly vile message as Lee writes below? No, it pales in comparison with Vox Populi's blog and comments she made to me on Lee's blog, and even with comments that Lee herself makes.
Thanks to the first-time poster for reiterating such things as free speech and the First Amendment. Lee's followers will probably think that you are me, but we know better.
Vulgar potty mouth? Arse? Lee de Cesare has used the term herself. When I find where she has done so, I'll post it here. Disrespecting women and the elderly? Rubbish! Lee writes that her age demands civility? Does she really want me to treat her differently based on her age? Discrimination is rife at casting room couch.
But so is hypocrisy. Lee has kittens if someone on the board makes any allusions to her mental capacity and gets her stinky knickers in a twist while crying, "I don't have Alzheimer's." (No one said she did?!) Amazingly, below she writes that she is not completely sure of my mental wellness.
(She has also written about determining mental illness here: http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/07/council-of-trent-aka-as-hillsborough.html >Now you and Steve Hegarty and perhaps others of the board and administration have apparently plotted to prevent my signing up for comment on agenda items because as Mr. Hegarty says, "they" think I am "confused" and don't know what I am talking about. Pray tell me if a licensed physician especially a psychiatrist has made this judgment and provide his or her name and also whether any of the people responsible for banning me from commenting on public issues marked with citizen-comment privilege on the Web-site agenda are licensed physicians, or are you and they practicing medicine without a license?<)
You're a hypocrite, Lee, but neither your age nor your sex will change the fact.
Finally, Lee bets that my comments will be on my blog. Even the lowliest board member with a Home-Ec degree from a cereal box can work out that I wrote that clearly in the post I made. Durr, teacher. Your comprehension skills are in the toilet again.
>Anonymous said...
Lee, I am a long time reader and first time commenter. I applaud your efforts at stopping the corruption of the school district, however, I must say I think you should allow john's comments. No matter how much we disagree with him, it is his first amendment right to be heard. That is what makes this country great. I don't understand how you can criticize the board for suppressing free speech while at the same time blocking john's comments. I hope you will reconsider your decision and allow his comments.
7:40 PM
twinkobie said...
I thought before I dropped John. He sent me a particularly vile message when I said I was cutting him out of the blog.
I don't mind criticism and correction--especially humorous, but I do mind a vulgar potty mouth. Humor is one thing. Vulgar vitriol is another. In addition, I am an elderly grandmother. John showed no respect for either women or the elderly when he wrote vile things on my blog. Young people have to observe some boundaries in their communication with us older people. Our age if nothing else demands civility from young people, COMMA SPLICE, YOU ILLITERATE BOZO And I must say I usually get respectful attention from most young people. John has crossed the line, and I don't intend to welcome him back over it. My patience finally wore out.
I am not completely sure of John's mental wellness. I think he needs therapy. I hope he gets it. John has his own blog's free-speech privileges on Antigrammargrinch. You can continue to read him there. But you won't be able to read him on my blog any longer.
He says he will continue to send me posts although I don't print them. I bet they will be on his blog. Read them there by all means. lee<
>I received bitter email from John D. and deleted it. The fellow is sicko. His words will no longer appear in Casting-room-couch's pages. Goodbye to all that. His next Internet Provider will probably be Chattahoochee. lee
Posted by twinkobie at 10:56 AM <
This alleged "bitter" email is the previous post on this blog. A particularly vile message as Lee writes below? No, it pales in comparison with Vox Populi's blog and comments she made to me on Lee's blog, and even with comments that Lee herself makes.
Thanks to the first-time poster for reiterating such things as free speech and the First Amendment. Lee's followers will probably think that you are me, but we know better.
Vulgar potty mouth? Arse? Lee de Cesare has used the term herself. When I find where she has done so, I'll post it here. Disrespecting women and the elderly? Rubbish! Lee writes that her age demands civility? Does she really want me to treat her differently based on her age? Discrimination is rife at casting room couch.
But so is hypocrisy. Lee has kittens if someone on the board makes any allusions to her mental capacity and gets her stinky knickers in a twist while crying, "I don't have Alzheimer's." (No one said she did?!) Amazingly, below she writes that she is not completely sure of my mental wellness.
(She has also written about determining mental illness here: http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/07/council-of-trent-aka-as-hillsborough.html >Now you and Steve Hegarty and perhaps others of the board and administration have apparently plotted to prevent my signing up for comment on agenda items because as Mr. Hegarty says, "they" think I am "confused" and don't know what I am talking about. Pray tell me if a licensed physician especially a psychiatrist has made this judgment and provide his or her name and also whether any of the people responsible for banning me from commenting on public issues marked with citizen-comment privilege on the Web-site agenda are licensed physicians, or are you and they practicing medicine without a license?<)
You're a hypocrite, Lee, but neither your age nor your sex will change the fact.
Finally, Lee bets that my comments will be on my blog. Even the lowliest board member with a Home-Ec degree from a cereal box can work out that I wrote that clearly in the post I made. Durr, teacher. Your comprehension skills are in the toilet again.
>Anonymous said...
Lee, I am a long time reader and first time commenter. I applaud your efforts at stopping the corruption of the school district, however, I must say I think you should allow john's comments. No matter how much we disagree with him, it is his first amendment right to be heard. That is what makes this country great. I don't understand how you can criticize the board for suppressing free speech while at the same time blocking john's comments. I hope you will reconsider your decision and allow his comments.
7:40 PM
twinkobie said...
I thought before I dropped John. He sent me a particularly vile message when I said I was cutting him out of the blog.
I don't mind criticism and correction--especially humorous, but I do mind a vulgar potty mouth. Humor is one thing. Vulgar vitriol is another. In addition, I am an elderly grandmother. John showed no respect for either women or the elderly when he wrote vile things on my blog. Young people have to observe some boundaries in their communication with us older people. Our age if nothing else demands civility from young people, COMMA SPLICE, YOU ILLITERATE BOZO And I must say I usually get respectful attention from most young people. John has crossed the line, and I don't intend to welcome him back over it. My patience finally wore out.
I am not completely sure of John's mental wellness. I think he needs therapy. I hope he gets it. John has his own blog's free-speech privileges on Antigrammargrinch. You can continue to read him there. But you won't be able to read him on my blog any longer.
He says he will continue to send me posts although I don't print them. I bet they will be on his blog. Read them there by all means. lee<
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
First Amendment be hanged!
http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/11/evil-may-come-and-evil-may-go-but.html
>A reluctant farewell to John D, whose comments I will no longer print. Those who want to follow his blog, go to AntiGrammargrinch. I wish John well but allow him no more free rides for his vitriol on my blog. May his house be safe from tigers. lee drury de cesare<
Reluctant my arse! You've always been gutless. You're too gutless to answer straightforward questions and too gutless to admit when you're wrong.
I don't particularly care if you don't publish my comments. It proves that you don't give a rat's arse about the First Amendment or free speech. I'll keep posting them because you'll keep reading them. I'm still going to call you on all your rubbish. I can post all I like at my blog (as you suggested all that time ago).
Twit!
>A reluctant farewell to John D, whose comments I will no longer print. Those who want to follow his blog, go to AntiGrammargrinch. I wish John well but allow him no more free rides for his vitriol on my blog. May his house be safe from tigers. lee drury de cesare<
Reluctant my arse! You've always been gutless. You're too gutless to answer straightforward questions and too gutless to admit when you're wrong.
I don't particularly care if you don't publish my comments. It proves that you don't give a rat's arse about the First Amendment or free speech. I'll keep posting them because you'll keep reading them. I'm still going to call you on all your rubbish. I can post all I like at my blog (as you suggested all that time ago).
Twit!
Monday, November 2, 2009
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Bring it on, Vox.
http://leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com/2009/10/this-says-it-all.html
>I apologixe for calling you a moron. I still think you are one<
Then you just called me one again, didn't you, Vox? Your apologies count for nothing.
>john_d if you'd care to curse me in email you feel free, you big brave manly man.<
I'll move this away from this [casting room couch] blog as Lee has requested and accept your offer, Vox. What is your email address?
You can also feel free to call me a moron at http://antigrammargrinch.blogspot.com/
so the whole world can read it if they choose.
>I apologixe for calling you a moron. I still think you are one<
Then you just called me one again, didn't you, Vox? Your apologies count for nothing.
>john_d if you'd care to curse me in email you feel free, you big brave manly man.<
I'll move this away from this [casting room couch] blog as Lee has requested and accept your offer, Vox. What is your email address?
You can also feel free to call me a moron at http://antigrammargrinch.blogspot.com/
so the whole world can read it if they choose.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
